Report after report say
the something. Each time a study group from abroad lands on our shores,
studies the Solomons' Social Unrest period (the seeds of which were
planted among us as early as 1986!) and make recommendations, each
and every report speaks about leadership. Or better still the lack
of good leadership! These studies whether from our own people or others,
point to the poor and unfocused leadership which our people have suffered
from especially since 1986.
In both the 1997 and 2001 national elections many good people thought
that electing more and more new parliamentarian leaders would change
the leadership of the country for the better. But this has proven
untrue. In the 2001 election, for example, 32 new members made it
to parliament but among those new members were at least 3 who were
closely tied to the 2000 Coup. These are the same 'leaders' who were
more than willing to destroy the nation for their own twisted purposes.
No, a new kind of new leader has to take root first of all among the
ordinary people in the village and town and then work itself up to
the national level.
But how to go about creating a new kind of leader? What does a new
type of leader look like? What qualities are necessary for the new
leader in this new century within a new country? Our leaders over
the past 25 years have failed to strengthen the nation. Few of them
shared a vision for the future! They had no dreams for the nation
fit for all people and for the whole nation.
Recently, since the middle of last year and continuing on this year,
police personnel, village Big Men in different provinces, church personnel
and leaders in the NGO sector have been participating in a new kind
of training. The Restorative Justice Workshops conducted by National
Council of Women, Literacy Association of Solomon Islands, SIDT and
other NGOs have been conducting leadership workshops across the nation.
One of the main lessons accented by this kind of training has been
the personal qualities of a sound and good leader.
For instance, in spite of the obvious lesson God himself teaches us
and one we see each morning when we look at our faces in the mirror,
old leaders talked much more than they listened. When a person looks
in a mirror, it becomes crystal clear that humans are suppose to listen
FOUR times more than they speak. Two ears and two eyes and only one
tongue! Too often, however, leaders reverse that order. They speak
four times more than they listen.
The Restorative Justice course walks participants through how a leader
should attentively listen. It's not merely a matter of the leader
keeping quiet but actively trying to hear what the other person is
trying to say. That means hearing not only the words coming out of
the other person's mouth but the body language, the small signs and
gestures that the other person uses while speaking with his voice.
We call this listening with the 'third ear'. Hearing the message behind
the words, Listening to the real meaning that is under the words used.
Quality listening can be learnt but needs much practice.
Active listening is but one goal of a good leader. The training course
talks about and practices other parts of a good leader's working for
his people. All these small things, however, disappear if the leader
is not straight, honest and caring. These qualities lie at the heart
of good leadership. The Restorative Justice course asks leaders on
all levels of society--police personnel, church leaders, NGO activists,
women's groups--to practice these traits first of all within their
own family. Once these qualities are rooted within the small society--the
family--it's time for them to be used in the big family, our society.
|
|
Just when the news coming out of Honiara had begun to look a little
more encouraging following the appointment of a new police commissioner
and a start to the demobilisation of special constables, aided by
a United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), there came the tragic
and shocking news of the assassination, while in Auki, of Sir Fred
Soaki, the first locally appointed police commissioner and peace
activist with the National Peace Council (NPC). Any speculation
on Sir Fred's murder must be avoided while police investigations
are conducted, but the fact that the National Peace Council members
have stopped their work for the time being, at least until the reason
for the killing is known, is understandable, but a set back to the
peace process. It is unfortunate, too, that there is now a delay
while the demobilisation programme on Auki is reviewed, but again
quite proper given Sir Fred's mission at the time of his death.
While there can be no comparison with the murder of Sir Fred Soaki
and the circumstances surrounding the killing of the late Father
Geve, it is true that both these honourable persons were actively
pursuing peace missions at the time of their deaths
and their sacrifices must not be forgotten, but rather serve to
intensify efforts to bring justice, peace and stability back to
the people of the Solomon Islands.
A recent announcement by Solomon Islands Prime Minister that the
European Union is about to release overdue funds, amounting to $200
million to Solomon Islands is welcome news and another signal that,
at least in the eyes of the EU, the ethnic tension has eased sufficiently
to make available the previously blocked funds. The Parliamentary
Opposition, it would seem, as welcomed the prime ministers statement,
but cautioned that the funding should be directed to income generating
schemes in areas such as agriculture, fisheries. forestry and tourism.
In the case of tourism, the news that the General Manager of the
Solomon Islands Visitors Bureau recently visited Brisbane to launch
a promotion campaign to entice more visitors to the Solomons was
encouraging, but there remains, I believe, a concern by intending
tourists about safety issues in Honiara in particular; a concern
not helped by the widely reported murder of Sir Fred.
It may well be that the EU applies strict conditions to the use
of the soon to be released funds, such as incentive programmes as
mentioned by the Parliamentary Opposition, but funding, in my humble
opinion, is still needed to kick start legislative moves for a Truth
and Reconciliation Commission and for added institutional strengthening
of the judiciary. I believe that justice delayed is justice denied
and despite recommendations contained in the first Amnesty International
Report on the Solomons conflict, a call for a judicial inquiry by
His Honour Justice Palmer, when acting Chief Justice, and several
similar calls by myself, the movement towards establishing as complete
a picture as possible of the causes, nature and extent of the so-called
ethnic tension and the gross violation of human rights which were
committed as a consequence, is unnecessarily delayed.
The truth about human rights violations in the Solomons cannot simply
be forgotten or suppressed. Society must be able to come to terms
with its past on a morally acceptable basis and to advance the cause
of reconciliation. The objective of such an exercise must not be
to conduct a witch hunt, but those responsible for starting what
amounted to a civil war must face the consequences of their actions.
In a paper written by Andrew Nori entitled "5th June 2000 in
Perspective" the self-styled Malaita Eagle Force spokesperson
and prominent Honiara based lawyer, he named those allegedly responsible
for planning and starting the conflict which has brought the once
peaceful, happy Solomon Islands to its knees. Since then further
information has come to light which adds more weight to his allegations.
A document in the form of a signed statement has now been sighted
which testifies to a meeting which took place at Visale on 14 March
1998 during which the participants, including a senior Guadalcanal
police officer, allegedly gave orders for a Guadalcanal Revolutionary
Army, for the collection of ammunition from old World War 11 sites,
for the making of home made guns and for the intimidation and threatening
of Malaitans - to expel them from Guadalcanal. The same statement
alleges that the police officer also ordered the raiding of the
Yandina Police Station to obtain high powered firearms.
What is all the more surprising about this statement is that from
an accompanying letter, dated 27 April 2000, the document was sent
to the Commissioner of Police, the Assistant Commissioner in Charge
of Operations, the Prime Minister's Office, The Director of Public
Prosecutions and the Bar Association - a full month before the coup
took place on 5 June 2000.
I do not believe that the majority of the citizens of Guadalcanal
or Malaita have a lasting hatred for each other and there is further
evidence of this in the understanding words of a contributor to
an article in the Solomon Star when it was said (in March 2000).
"After so many years of interactions (inter-marriages, co-education,
co-sports, co-employment, co-worship) and coexistence as one nation
and one people, it is difficult to accept that one major community
would merely resent another without any convincing causes or reasons.
Silent resentment of Malaita people by certain Guadalcanal and Western
communities have been known to exist for many years but, in time,
through socio-economic progress and social interactions they have
either evaporated or (been) forgotten."
It is more likely, based on what is now known, that just a few betrayed
their people, caused untold suffering, pain and harm and the disabling
of a once proud nation. It is time for the nation to fight back,
to throw off the label of a "failed state" and actively
pursue national unity and reconciliation in a spirit of understanding
which transcends the conflicts and the divisions of the past - and
surely this is owed to the many victims and the fallen peacemakers
alike.
|